<div dir="ltr">You're using CC="/usr/bin/cc". It needs to be clang for USE_LIBCPP to do anything. :/</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Todd Fiala <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:todd.fiala@gmail.com" target="_blank">todd.fiala@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Here are a couple of the failures that came up (the log output from the full dosep.py run).<div><br></div><div>Let me know if that is not sufficient!</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><div><div class="h5"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 9:14 AM, Pavel Labath <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:labath@google.com" target="_blank">labath@google.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">There's no need to do anything fancy (yet :) ). For initial diagnosis<br>
the output of `./dotest.py $your_usual_options -p SomeLibcxxTest.py<br>
-t` should suffice.<br>
<span><font color="#888888"><br>
pl<br>
</font></span><div><div><br>
On 25 August 2015 at 16:45, Todd Fiala <<a href="mailto:todd.fiala@gmail.com" target="_blank">todd.fiala@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Thanks, Pavel! I'll dig that up and get back.<br>
><br>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 8:30 AM, Pavel Labath <<a href="mailto:labath@google.com" target="_blank">labath@google.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> There is no separate option, it should just work. :)<br>
>><br>
>> I'm betting you are still missing some package there (we should<br>
>> document the prerequisites better). Could you send the error message<br>
>> you are getting so we can have a look.<br>
>><br>
>> cheers,<br>
>> pl<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> On 25 August 2015 at 16:20, Todd Fiala via lldb-dev<br>
>> <<a href="mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>> wrote:<br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>> > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Todd Fiala <<a href="mailto:todd.fiala@gmail.com" target="_blank">todd.fiala@gmail.com</a>><br>
>> > wrote:<br>
>> >><br>
>> >><br>
>> >><br>
>> >> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Chaoren Lin <<a href="mailto:chaorenl@google.com" target="_blank">chaorenl@google.com</a>><br>
>> >> wrote:<br>
>> >>><br>
>> >>> The TestDataFormatterLibcc* tests require libc++-dev:<br>
>> >>><br>
>> >>> $ sudo apt-get install libc++-dev<br>
>> >>><br>
>> >><br>
>> >> Ah okay, so we are working with libc++ on Ubuntu, that's good to hear.<br>
>> >> Pre-14.04 I gave up on it.<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> Will cmake automatically choose libc++ if it is present? Or do I need<br>
>> >> to<br>
>> >> pass something to cmake to use libc++?<br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>> > Hmm it appears I need to do more than just install libc++-dev. I did a<br>
>> > clean build with that installed, then ran the tests, and I still have<br>
>> > the<br>
>> > Libcxc/Libcxx tests failing. Is there some flag expected, either to<br>
>> > pass<br>
>> > along for the compile options to dotest.py to override/specify which c++<br>
>> > lib<br>
>> > it is using?<br>
>> ><br>
>> >><br>
>> >><br>
>> >> Thanks, Chaoren!<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> -Todd<br>
>> >><br>
>> >>><br>
>> >>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Todd Fiala via lldb-dev<br>
>> >>> <<a href="mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>> wrote:<br>
>> >>>><br>
>> >>>><br>
>> >>>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Zachary Turner <<a href="mailto:zturner@google.com" target="_blank">zturner@google.com</a>><br>
>> >>>> wrote:<br>
>> >>>>><br>
>> >>>>> Can't comment on the failures for Linux, but I don't think we have a<br>
>> >>>>> good handle on the unexpected successes. I only added that<br>
>> >>>>> information to<br>
>> >>>>> the output about a week ago, before that unexpected successes were<br>
>> >>>>> actually<br>
>> >>>>> going unnoticed.<br>
>> >>>><br>
>> >>>><br>
>> >>>> Okay, thanks Zachary. A while back we had some flapping tests that<br>
>> >>>> would oscillate between unexpected success and failure on Linux.<br>
>> >>>> Some of<br>
>> >>>> those might still be in that state but maybe (!) are fixed.<br>
>> >>>><br>
>> >>>> Anyone on the Linux end who happens to know if the fails in<br>
>> >>>> particular<br>
>> >>>> look normal, that'd be good to know.<br>
>> >>>><br>
>> >>>> Thanks!<br>
>> >>>><br>
>> >>>>><br>
>> >>>>><br>
>> >>>>> It's likely that someone could just go in there and remove the XFAIL<br>
>> >>>>> from those tests.<br>
>> >>>>><br>
>> >>>>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 3:37 PM Todd Fiala via lldb-dev<br>
>> >>>>> <<a href="mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>> wrote:<br>
>> >>>>>><br>
>> >>>>>> Hi all,<br>
>> >>>>>><br>
>> >>>>>> I'm just trying to get a handle on current lldb test failures<br>
>> >>>>>> across<br>
>> >>>>>> different platforms.<br>
>> >>>>>><br>
>> >>>>>> On Linux on non-virtualized hardware, I currently see the failures<br>
>> >>>>>> below on Ubuntu 14.04.2 using a setup like this:<br>
>> >>>>>> * stock linker (ld.bfd),<br>
>> >>>>>> * g++ 4.9.2<br>
>> >>>>>> * cmake<br>
>> >>>>>> * ninja<br>
>> >>>>>> * libstdc++<br>
>> >>>>>><br>
>> >>>>>> ninja check-lldb output:<br>
>> >>>>>><br>
>> >>>>>> Ran 394 test suites (15 failed) (3.807107%)<br>
>> >>>>>> Ran 474 test cases (17 failed) (3.586498%)<br>
>> >>>>>> Failing Tests (15)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestCPPThis.py (Linux rad 3.13.0-57-generic<br>
>> >>>>>> #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibccIterator.py (Linux rad<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibccMap.py (Linux rad<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibccMultiMap.py (Linux rad<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibcxxMultiSet.py (Linux rad<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibcxxSet.py (Linux rad<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibcxxString.py (Linux rad<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterSkipSummary.py (Linux rad<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterUnordered.py (Linux rad<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiGdbSetShowPrint.py (Linux rad<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestRegisterVariables.py (Linux rad<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestStaticVariables.py (Linux rad<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestStepNoDebug.py (Linux rad<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic<br>
>> >>>>>> #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestTypedefArray.py (Linux rad<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic<br>
>> >>>>>> #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestVectorTypesFormatting.py (Linux rad<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>><br>
>> >>>>>> Unexpected Successes (10)<br>
>> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestBatchMode.py (Linux rad<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestEvents.py (Linux rad<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestExitDuringStep.py (Linux<br>
>> >>>>>> rad<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestFdLeak.py (Linux rad<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestInferiorAssert.py (Linux<br>
>> >>>>>> rad<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiGdbSetShow.py (Linux rad<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiInterpreterExec.py (Linux<br>
>> >>>>>> rad 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiSyntax.py (Linux rad<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestRaise.py (Linux rad<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestStubSetSID.py (Linux rad<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.<br>
>> >>>>>><br>
>> >>>>>><br>
>> >>>>>><br>
>> >>>>>> On a similar setup, although bumped up to Ubuntu 14.04.3 and now on<br>
>> >>>>>> a<br>
>> >>>>>> VMWare VM, everything else the same, I see a similar report from<br>
>> >>>>>> 'ninja<br>
>> >>>>>> check-lldb':<br>
>> >>>>>><br>
>> >>>>>> Ran 394 test suites (17 failed) (4.314721%)<br>
>> >>>>>> Ran 474 test cases (19 failed) (4.008439%)<br>
>> >>>>>> Failing Tests (17)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestAttachResume.py (Linux lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestCPPThis.py (Linux lldb 3.19.0-26-generic<br>
>> >>>>>> #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibccIterator.py (Linux lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibccMap.py (Linux lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibccMultiMap.py (Linux lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibcxxMultiSet.py (Linux<br>
>> >>>>>> lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibcxxSet.py (Linux lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibcxxString.py (Linux lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterSkipSummary.py (Linux lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterUnordered.py (Linux lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiGdbSetShowPrint.py (Linux lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestRegisterVariables.py (Linux lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestStaticVariables.py (Linux lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestStepNoDebug.py (Linux lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic<br>
>> >>>>>> #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestStepOverWatchpoint.py (Linux lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestTypedefArray.py (Linux lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestVectorTypesFormatting.py (Linux lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>><br>
>> >>>>>> Unexpected Successes (11)<br>
>> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestBatchMode.py (Linux lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestEvents.py (Linux lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestExitDuringStep.py (Linux<br>
>> >>>>>> lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestFdLeak.py (Linux lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestInferiorAssert.py (Linux<br>
>> >>>>>> lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiGdbSetShow.py (Linux lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiInterpreterExec.py (Linux<br>
>> >>>>>> lldb 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17<br>
>> >>>>>> UTC 2015<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiSyntax.py (Linux lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestRaise.py (Linux lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestStubSetSID.py (Linux lldb<br>
>> >>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64<br>
>> >>>>>> x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestWatchedVarHitWhenInScope.py<br>
>> >>>>>> (Linux lldb 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12<br>
>> >>>>>> 14:09:17 UTC<br>
>> >>>>>> 2015 x86_64 x86_64)<br>
>> >>>>>> ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.<br>
>> >>>>>><br>
>> >>>>>><br>
>> >>>>>> Do these more or less match the current state of affairs for Linux<br>
>> >>>>>> tests? If not, are there any suggestions on best practices for<br>
>> >>>>>> upgrades? A<br>
>> >>>>>> while back I had tried things like clang and libc++ but I had<br>
>> >>>>>> arrived at the<br>
>> >>>>>> above setup (albeit typically with the gold linker) simply due to<br>
>> >>>>>> what<br>
>> >>>>>> worked, what was easy to debug and what built fast.<br>
>> >>>>>><br>
>> >>>>>> Thanks for any confirmation on that!<br>
>> >>>>>><br>
>> >>>>>> --<br>
>> >>>>>> -Todd<br>
>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> >>>>>> lldb-dev mailing list<br>
>> >>>>>> <a href="mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org</a><br>
>> >>>>>> <a href="http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev</a><br>
>> >>>><br>
>> >>>><br>
>> >>>><br>
>> >>>><br>
>> >>>> --<br>
>> >>>> -Todd<br>
>> >>>><br>
>> >>>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> >>>> lldb-dev mailing list<br>
>> >>>> <a href="mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org</a><br>
>> >>>> <a href="http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev</a><br>
>> >>>><br>
>> >>><br>
>> >><br>
>> >><br>
>> >><br>
>> >> --<br>
>> >> -Todd<br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>> > --<br>
>> > -Todd<br>
>> ><br>
>> > _______________________________________________<br>
>> > lldb-dev mailing list<br>
>> > <a href="mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org</a><br>
>> > <a href="http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev</a><br>
>> ><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> --<br>
> -Todd<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div></div></div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">-- <br><div><div dir="ltr">-Todd</div></div>
</font></span></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>