[lldb-dev] How to deal with STL type names in C++ code?

[Siva Chandra via lldb-dev]

Hi Enrico,

I was thinking about the same issue today. Could we add a concept
called "TypeNameModifier" and provide ability to define modifiers in
scripts and command line? With this, a name like
std::__1::basic_string<...> can be modified into a more friendly name
like std::string? We could ofcourse have more complex modifications.

I think it is doable, but what is your (and the community's) opinion
about adding such a feature? If you are OK, I would like to take up
adding such a feature.

Thanks,
Siva Chandra

On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Enrico Granata via lldb-dev
<lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Hi Eugene,
>
> On Aug 6, 2015, at 2:02 PM, Eugene Birukov via lldb-dev
> <lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am using LLDB C++ API to create custom debugger and trying to dump
> variables with their types. To do that I am using SBValue.GetTypeName() API.
> Some types are OK, but some others - especially ones related to STL - are
> quite unreadable:
>
>
> those type names are the actual fully-specialized STL type names. I am not
> sure how to control GDB to stop truncating your string formatting, but after
> the “…” there actually is more text
> It looks like what you have is std::unique_ptr<std::vector<std::string> > >
> and those templates all take more arguments which are defaulted so you don’t
> have to type them in code - but are reflected in the type name
>
> (gdb) p value.GetTypeName()
> $1 = 0x7fffe419be40
> "std::__1::unique_ptr<std::__1::vector<std::__1::basic_string<char,
> std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char> >,
> std::__1::allocator<std::__1::basic_string<char,
> std::__1::char_traits<char"...
> (gdb) p value.GetDisplayTypeName()
> $2 = 0x7fffe419be40
> "std::__1::unique_ptr<std::__1::vector<std::__1::basic_string<char,
> std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char> >,
> std::__1::allocator<std::__1::basic_string<char,
> std::__1::char_traits<char"...
> (gdb)
>
>
> So, is there any way to convert them into some more human-friendly form?
>
>
> Not currently. What one would have to do is hook into the C++ type printing
> logic such that it would know to leave out these extra template arguments
> when they have a default value
>
>
> Thanks,
> Eugene
> _______________________________________________
> lldb-dev mailing list
> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> - Enrico
> 📩 egranata@.com ️ 27683
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lldb-dev mailing list
> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
>