[lldb-dev] Xcode builds

[Todd Fiala]

> No one should be including it manually as we shouldn't have ANY code
depending on platform specific headers. Try preprocessing your file and see
who includes machine.h.

Will do.


On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Greg Clayton <gclayton at apple.com> wrote:

>
> On May 2, 2014, at 1:02 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Greg Clayton <gclayton at apple.com>
> wrote:
> > Looks like you are getting a conflict with the macros defined in:
> >
> > <mach/machine.h>
> >
> > and these are ruining the defines set in:
> >
> > "llvm/Support/MachO.h"
> >
> > So you aren't missing anything and I am not sure why things are
> different for us. I thought this was fixed by adding an underscore in front
> of all CPU_TYPE_XXX items in MachO.h that exactly matched macros in
> machine.h... It is really lame that a header file in LLVM is using macros
> that exactly match enums.
> >
> > Feature, not a bug.  IMO it's lame that <mach/machine.h> uses macros
> instead of enums.  ;)
>
> I completely agree, but alas we are stuck with this on MacOSX.
>
> > Is <mach/machine.h> pulled in transitively, or is it an explicit
> include?  If so, what's being used?  Can it be isolated to a single cpp
> file?
>
> No one should be including it manually as we shouldn't have ANY code
> depending on platform specific headers. Try preprocessing your file and see
> who includes machine.h.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lldb-dev mailing list
> lldb-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
>



-- 
Todd Fiala | Software Engineer | tfiala at google.com | 650-943-3180
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20140502/70073dae/attachment.html>