[lldb-dev] large patches vs incremental changes

[Zachary Turner]

On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com>
> wrote:
>
>>  Are we're ok with having broken code upstreamed for a short time on the
>> condition that the committer is acting in good faith to fix it as soon as
>> possible?
>>
>
> I think this is a separate question. Build bots should *never* be left
> broken, etc.
>

*This* may actually be a separate *separate* question.  :)  LLDB's build
bots have been broken for a long time, AFAICT.  Also the only build bot is
for Darwin.  Understandable why that is, although it would be nice to get
ones for other platforms.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20140701/77e00282/attachment.html>