[lldb-dev] LLDB back in sync with top-of-tree LLVM/Clang

[João Matos]

Could we get a MSVC build bot of the Windows branch too? If this is
possible who should I contact?

On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:30 AM, NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com>wrote:

> George, as far as I know,
>
> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86_64-linux
> http://llvm-amd64.freebsd.your.org:8010/builders/lldb-amd64-freebsd
> http://llvm-amd64.freebsd.your.org:8010/builders/lldb-i386-freebsd
>
> ...Takumi
>
> 2012/9/25 George Russell <george at codeplay.com>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Are there currently any publically viewable LLDB build-bots that can show
> > the build status / test status of LLDB?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > George
> >
> >
> > On 25/09/12 00:23, Sean Callanan wrote:
> >>
> >> As of revision 164563 (but, as I say below, please check out 164573),
> LLDB
> >> is back in sync with top-of-tree Clang.
> >>
> >> This commit has several important implications:
> >> –
> >> 1. LLDB is no longer tied to a specific Clang revision.  LLDB
> top-of-tree
> >> is intended to build against Clang top-of-tree.  That means we have to
> fix
> >> any build failures quickly, and I'll be keeping track of compatibility
> until
> >> we get a more permanent solution.
> >> 2. We no longer use local patches (scripts/{llvm,clang}.*.diff) of any
> >> sort.  To ensure LLDB stability, we will make LLDB release branches that
> >> will be tied to Clang release branches.
> >> 3. We no longer use or commit llvm.zip.  If you don't want to have to
> >> rebuild Clang, just don't update your local lldb/llvm tree.
> >> –
> >> Building LLDB on OS X works the same way it did before: open up
> >> lldb.xcworkspace and build the LLDB scheme.
> >>
> >> For your convenience, I have added a new configuration to the
> .xcodeproj:
> >> DebugClang (available as of revision 164573).  Here's the difference
> between
> >> Debug and DebugClang:
> >>
> >> - Debug builds a Release+Asserts version of Clang, which is easy on the
> >> debug information size, but still appropriately yelps when LLDB abuses
> it.
> >> - DebugClang builds a Debug+Asserts version of Clang, which contains a
> TON
> >> of debug information.
> >>
> >> Unless you are working specifically on the Clang integration, you'll
> >> probably prefer Debug.
> >>
> >> Sean
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> lldb-dev mailing list
> >> lldb-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > lldb-dev mailing list
> > lldb-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> lldb-dev mailing list
> lldb-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
>



-- 
João Matos
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20120925/85e1371f/attachment.html>