[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [lldb] Introduce DynamicRegisterInfo::RegisterSetWithStorage (PR #225555)

[Minsoo Choo via lldb-commits]

https://github.com/mchoo7 approved this pull request.

> I'm curious about the "create (a) new dynamic data structure" part. DynamicRegisterInfo is meant to be exactly that, why would you not re-use it in that scenario?

I just wanted to check if there could be any scerarios like that, but if DynamicRegisterInfo covers all those cases and RegisterSet is not used alone dynamically somewhere else, I'm happy with this change.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/225555