[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [lldb] Adjust the for loop condition to prevent unintended increments in ExpandRLE (NFC) (PR #94844)
via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Jun 7 23:31:03 PDT 2024
llvmbot wrote:
<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Shivam Gupta (xgupta)
<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>
This PR address the issue reported by static analyser cppcheck regarding missing bounds check for extra iterator increment in a loop. This could lead to accessing out-of-bounds memory.
To fix this we have adjusted the loop conditions to not incrementing iterator c there.
Caught by cppcheck -
lldb/source/Plugins/Process/gdb-remote/GDBRemoteCommunication.cpp:1300:75: warning: Missing bounds check for extra iterator increment in loop. [StlMissingComparison]
Fix #<!-- -->91225
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94844.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) lldb/source/Plugins/Process/gdb-remote/GDBRemoteCommunication.cpp (+2-1)
``````````diff
diff --git a/lldb/source/Plugins/Process/gdb-remote/GDBRemoteCommunication.cpp b/lldb/source/Plugins/Process/gdb-remote/GDBRemoteCommunication.cpp
index 8a47eed3d7cbe..81644d6248a83 100644
--- a/lldb/source/Plugins/Process/gdb-remote/GDBRemoteCommunication.cpp
+++ b/lldb/source/Plugins/Process/gdb-remote/GDBRemoteCommunication.cpp
@@ -1297,7 +1297,7 @@ std::string GDBRemoteCommunication::ExpandRLE(std::string packet) {
// Reserve enough byte for the most common case (no RLE used).
std::string decoded;
decoded.reserve(packet.size());
- for (std::string::const_iterator c = packet.begin(); c != packet.end(); ++c) {
+ for (std::string::const_iterator c = packet.begin(); c != packet.end();) {
if (*c == '*') {
// '*' indicates RLE. Next character will give us the repeat count and
// previous character is what is to be repeated.
@@ -1316,6 +1316,7 @@ std::string GDBRemoteCommunication::ExpandRLE(std::string packet) {
} else {
decoded.push_back(*c);
}
+ c++;
}
return decoded;
}
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94844
More information about the lldb-commits
mailing list