[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [SymbolFileDWARF][NFC] Remove duplicated code checking for type tags (PR #74773)
Felipe de Azevedo Piovezan via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Dec 8 05:34:35 PST 2023
================
@@ -3128,36 +3121,11 @@ SymbolFileDWARF::FindDefinitionTypeForDWARFDeclContext(const DWARFDIE &die) {
if (type_system &&
!type_system->SupportsLanguage(GetLanguage(*type_die.GetCU())))
return true;
- bool try_resolving_type = false;
- // Don't try and resolve the DIE we are looking for with the DIE
- // itself!
const dw_tag_t type_tag = type_die.Tag();
- // Make sure the tags match
- if (type_tag == tag) {
- // The tags match, lets try resolving this type
- try_resolving_type = true;
- } else {
- // The tags don't match, but we need to watch our for a forward
- // declaration for a struct and ("struct foo") ends up being a
- // class ("class foo { ... };") or vice versa.
- switch (type_tag) {
- case DW_TAG_class_type:
- // We had a "class foo", see if we ended up with a "struct foo
- // { ... };"
- try_resolving_type = (tag == DW_TAG_structure_type);
- break;
- case DW_TAG_structure_type:
- // We had a "struct foo", see if we ended up with a "class foo
- // { ... };"
- try_resolving_type = (tag == DW_TAG_class_type);
- break;
- default:
- // Tags don't match, don't event try to resolve using this type
- // whose name matches....
- break;
- }
- }
+ // Resolve the type if both have the same tag or {class, struct} tags.
+ const bool try_resolving_type =
+ type_tag == tag || (IsTypeTag(type_tag) && IsTypeTag(tag));
----------------
felipepiovezan wrote:
I'm not sure I follow, the logic of the opposite: equality failed, so we have to test whether both are "clasd-ish" tags. If one is a class but the other is a namespace, we need this expression to be false
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74773
More information about the lldb-commits
mailing list