[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D144937: [LLDB] Expose several methods in SBWatchpoint
Med Ismail Bennani via Phabricator via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Feb 28 15:00:26 PST 2023
mib added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lldb/test/API/python_api/watchpoint/TestSetWatchpoint.py:68
+ self.runCmd('watchpoint set variable -w read_write -- global')
+ watchpoint = target.GetWatchpointAtIndex(0)
+ self.assertTrue(watchpoint.IsWatchVariable())
----------------
delcypher wrote:
> mib wrote:
> > `runCmd` doesn't check if the command succeeded, so you probably want to add an asset to check the number of watchpoint on the target is not zero.
> @mib Did I misunderstand something? `runCmd` has this in the end of its implementation.
>
> ```lang=python
> if check:
> output = ""
> if self.res.GetOutput():
> output += "\nCommand output:\n" + self.res.GetOutput()
> if self.res.GetError():
> output += "\nError output:\n" + self.res.GetError()
> if msg:
> msg += output
> if cmd:
> cmd += output
> self.assertTrue(self.res.Succeeded(),
> msg if (msg) else CMD_MSG(cmd))
> ```
>
> and `check` is set to `True` by default.
>
> So it looks like `runCmd` does check that the command succeeded.
In that case, it's fine. Otherwise, I'd have expected to have `self.assertGreater(target.GetNumWatchpoints(), 0)` before calling `target.GetWatpointAtIndex(0)`
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D144937/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D144937
More information about the lldb-commits
mailing list