[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D139379: [llvm][dwwarf] Change CU/TU index to 64-bit

Alexander Yermolovich via Phabricator via lldb-commits lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Dec 23 14:19:18 PST 2022


ayermolo added a comment.

In D139379#4015569 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D139379#4015569>, @dblaikie wrote:

> In D139379#3972876 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D139379#3972876>, @ayermolo wrote:
>
>> In D139379#3972871 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D139379#3972871>, @dblaikie wrote:
>>
>>> Perhaps the change to use accessors could be removed, now that you've used it to find all the places that needed to be fixed up? (like just using it for cleanup/temporary purposes, without needing to commit that API change?)
>>
>> I am not sure what other projects are using it, that I missed, or not in llvm-trunk, but are based of it.
>
> It's awkward to convolute the API to ensure a breakage - I think it's best to leave it as-is, for the most part. I guess you needed the 32 bit accessors so existing code doesn't become UB because of truncation to 32 bit?
>
> Could the code keep the existing member names, provide the wrappers without turning the members into an array and needing named index constants, etc, at least? (though even then, seems like there's more to it than needed)

Thanks for circling back to this during holidays. :)
Right, that was my original thought pattern. I am fully open to the idea that this is not the right approach. :)


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D139379/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D139379



More information about the lldb-commits mailing list