[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D127164: [WebAssembly] Add WASM_SEC_LAST_KNOWN to BinaryFormat section types list [NFC]
Heejin Ahn via Phabricator via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jun 6 17:24:03 PDT 2022
aheejin added inline comments.
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/ObjCopy/wasm/WasmReader.cpp:32-35
- // If the section type is CUSTOM, it has a name already. If it's a new type
- // of section that we don't explicitly handle here, it will have an empty
- // name and objcopy won't be able to select it by name (e.g. for removal
- // or dumping) but it will still be valid and able to be copied.
----------------
dschuff wrote:
> aheejin wrote:
> > Why was this removed? It doesn't look like it's related to the last section thing.. It's just explaning custom sections have names already.
> Checking against `WASM_SEC_LAST_KNOWN` ensures that there can't be a new type of section that we don't explicitly handle here (because no types of known sections are explicitly handled or mentioned); any section known to `sectionTypeToString` will work.
I'm not sure if I understand. Is this related to `WASM_SEC_TAG` -> `WASM_LAST_SEC_KNOWN` change in this PR? Or it's just an unrelated drive-by fix?
> Checking against `WASM_SEC_LAST_KNOWN` ensures that there can't be a new type of section that we don't explicitly handle here (because no types of known sections are explicitly handled or mentioned);
I'm not sure what this means..
> If the section type is CUSTOM, it has a name already.
Why is this deleted too? How is the custom section related to `WASM_SEC_LAST_KNOWN`?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D127164/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D127164
More information about the lldb-commits
mailing list