[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D120320: [lldb/driver] Fix SIGTSTP handling

[David Spickett via Phabricator via lldb-commits]

DavidSpickett added a comment.

Got it, thanks for the explanation.

> What's important is that the second signal gets delivered (not "handled", because at that point we have removed the handler) to the same thread, as that's the only one we're sure that will have it unblocked (although, in practice, all threads will probably have it unblocked).

Right, I was focusing on the "will return only after the signal handler has returned" aspect, but that's not the reason to you're choosing to use `raise`.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D120320/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D120320