[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D78801: [LLDB] Add class WasmProcess for WebAssembly debugging
Rachel Lane via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sat Jan 29 12:01:59 PST 2022
Hi Rachel, Your Facebook account has been logged in to recently using a confirmation code and the email address rr4433lalala at gmail.com on Saturday, 29 January 2022 at 12:40 (UTC). Device: iPhone 5s IP address: 85.255.237.205 Network Provider: Vodafone UK If you did this, you can safely disregard this email. If you didn't do this, please secure your account . Thanks, The Facebook Security Team
Facebook
Hi Rachel,
Your Facebook account has been logged in to recently using a confirmation code and the email address rr4433lalala at gmail.com on Saturday, 29 January 2022 at 12:40 (UTC).
Device: iPhone 5s
IP address: 85.255.237.205
Network Provider: Vodafone UK
If you did this, you can safely disregard this email.
If you didn't do this, please secure your account.
Thanks,
The Facebook Security Team
This message was sent to rr4433lalala at gmail.com at your request.
Meta Platforms Ireland Ltd., Attention: Community Operations, 4 Grand Canal Square, Dublin 2, Ireland
To help keep your account secure, please don't forward this email. Learn more
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 29, 4 Reiwa, at 4:11 am, Xu Jun via Phabricator via lldb-commits <lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> xujuntwt95329 added a comment.
>
> In D78801#3279811 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D78801#3279811>, @paolosev wrote:
>
>> Thanks @xujuntwt95329! I am very happy that this was useful for WebAssembly Micro Runtime!
>
> I believe we are making the world of WebAssembly better!
>
> BTW, I find an issue when trying to debug multi-thread wasm app:
> The `qWasmLocal` package doesn't contain the thread id, which means it can only get locals of the current thread. If we have thread A, B and C, and they stopped at the same time, then LLDB will send three `qWasmLocal` package, and the wasm runtime will give same reply.
>
> I think we should add thread id into `qWasmLocal` so that wasm runtime will know which thread to process, Am I right?
>
>
> Repository:
> rG LLVM Github Monorepo
>
> CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D78801/new/
>
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D78801
>
> _______________________________________________
> lldb-commits mailing list
> lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-commits/attachments/20220129/b8e69320/attachment.html>
More information about the lldb-commits
mailing list