[Lldb-commits] [lldb] 6438a52 - Revert "[clang] retain type sugar in auto / template argument deduction"

David Blaikie via lldb-commits lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sun Nov 14 15:45:10 PST 2021


Thanks for the details!

On Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 3:39 PM Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov at gmail.com> wrote:

> Oops, my bad!
>
> The reason for reverting this is that this is a recent commit, and
> there are reports of breakage building libANGLE which have not been
> investigated.
>
> See https://reviews.llvm.org/D110216 for details / future developments.
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 12:33 AM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 3:30 PM Matheus Izvekov via lldb-commits <
> lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Author: Matheus Izvekov
> >> Date: 2021-11-15T00:29:05+01:00
> >> New Revision: 6438a52df1c7f36952b6126ff7b978861b76ad45
> >>
> >> URL:
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6438a52df1c7f36952b6126ff7b978861b76ad45
> >> DIFF:
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6438a52df1c7f36952b6126ff7b978861b76ad45.diff
> >>
> >> LOG: Revert "[clang] retain type sugar in auto / template argument
> deduction"
> >>
> >> This reverts commit 4d8fff477e024698facd89741cc6cf996708d598.
> >
> >
> > Would be good to include some details about the reason for reverting
> patches in the commit message - helps folks identify whether a particular
> revert will address issues they might be investigating, and increases the
> chance folks might avoid the same mistakes if they're pursuing a similar
> direction in the future.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-commits/attachments/20211114/bc0d34ac/attachment.html>


More information about the lldb-commits mailing list