[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D96537: Make the error condition in Value::ValueType explicit (NFC)
Shafik Yaghmour via Phabricator via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Feb 12 22:23:08 PST 2021
shafik added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lldb/source/Core/Value.cpp:574
switch (m_value_type) {
- case eValueTypeScalar: // raw scalar value
+ case ValueType::Invalid:
+ case ValueType::Scalar: // raw scalar value
----------------
aprantl wrote:
> shafik wrote:
> > In the invalid case does `m_value` have some initial value i.e. it is not uninitialized.
> I don't understand what you are asking here?
The other cases initialize `m_value` or call `Clear` on it and `m_value` is return at the end and I was asking is it is properly initialized.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D96537/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D96537
More information about the lldb-commits
mailing list