[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D91216: [lldb] [Process/FreeBSDRemote] Access GPR via reginfo offsets

Pavel Labath via Phabricator via lldb-commits lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Nov 11 01:00:46 PST 2020


labath added a comment.

In D91216#2387956 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D91216#2387956>, @mgorny wrote:

> In D91216#2387909 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D91216#2387909>, @labath wrote:
>
>> Regarding the asserts, I'm thinking if it wouldn't be better to check the compare the resulting RegisterInfo structs instead of the raw struct layout. The reasons for that are:
>>
>> - it will be checking the thing that we're actually relying on (the register info macros is pretty complex and can be messed up easily
>> - the register info artifacts (unlike the GPR structs) are exported from these files, so the checks for that could be placed into a unit test
>>
>> What do you think?
>
> I presume you mean verifying that `byte_offset`s and `byte_size`s are written correctly to the struct?

Yes, exactly.

> I like the idea that static asserts are going to blow up during compilation already but I suppose it's not very important as I don't expect these structures to change.

That's true, but I've found that the inclusion of system headers (with all their acoompanying ifdefs) looks pretty bad...


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D91216/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D91216



More information about the lldb-commits mailing list