[Lldb-commits] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot

[Vitaly Buka via lldb-commits]

Thanks, I see them.

On Wed, 7 Oct 2020 at 16:32, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote:

> They are online now - http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer
>
> AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new buildbot.
> We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but it will
> need more love and care.
>
> Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on porting
> AnnotatedCommand.
>
> It's unlikely in near future.
What is missing exactly?


> Thanks
>
> Galina
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 2:57 PM Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote:
>
>> It looks like all sanitizer builder are still offline
>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders
>>
>> On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 at 00:34, Galina Kistanova via cfe-commits <
>> cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>
>>> The staging buildbot was up and running for 6 days now, and looks good.
>>>
>>> Tomorrow at 12:00 PM PDT we will switch the production buildbot to the
>>> new version.
>>>
>>> If you are a bot owner, you do not need to do anything at this point,
>>> unless I'll ask you to help.
>>> The buildbot will go down for a short period of time, and then a new
>>> version will come up and will accept connections from your bots.
>>>
>>> Please note that the new version has a bit different URL structure. You
>>> will need to update the bookmarks or scripts if you have stored direct URLs
>>> to inside the buldbot.
>>>
>>> We will be watching the production and staging bots and will be
>>> improving zorg for the next week or so.
>>>
>>> I will need your feedback about blame e-mails delivery, IRC reporting
>>> issues, and anything you could spot wrong with the new bot. I  hope the
>>> transition will go smoothly and we will handle issues quickly if any would
>>> come up.
>>>
>>> After production is good and we have about a week of running history,
>>> I'll ask the bot owners to upgrade buildbots on their side. Please do
>>> not upgrade your buildbots unless I'll ask you to. We are trying to
>>> limit a number of moving parts at this stage. We will start accepting
>>> change to zorg at this point. Please feel free to talk to me if you will
>>> have a special situation and if you would absolutely have to make changes.
>>>
>>> Thanks for your support and help. And please feel free to ask if you
>>> have questions.
>>>
>>> Galina
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 9:35 PM Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello everyone,
>>>>
>>>> The buildbot upgrade is entering the phase when the results to become
>>>> visible.
>>>>
>>>> No change is required at this time on any of the builders. The bot
>>>> owners could upgrade the buildbot on build computers later, at their
>>>> convenience, as this is not on the critical path.
>>>>
>>>> We are going to upgrade the staging bot first. Then, once that is
>>>> stable and all detected issues are resolved, we will upgrade the production
>>>> bot.
>>>>
>>>> I will need some help with testing, and will be asking to move some of
>>>> the builders temporarily to the staging. LLVM buildbot is a piece of
>>>> critical infrastructure, so more eyes and hands in making sure it works
>>>> properly the better.
>>>>
>>>> I'll be posting updates and ETA of particular changes in this thread.
>>>>
>>>> Please feel free to ask if you have any questions or concerns.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Galina
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cfe-commits mailing list
>>> cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
>>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-commits/attachments/20201012/027055f3/attachment.html>