[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D77759: [lldb/Reproducers] Fix passive replay for functions returning string as (char*, size_t).

[Jonas Devlieghere via Phabricator via lldb-commits]

JDevlieghere updated this revision to Diff 258172.
JDevlieghere added a comment.

Remove duplication similar to D77602 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D77602>.

Honestly, at this point I'm not convinced that the difference between active and passive replay warrants special handling. Other than the slightly different macros, which are unfortunate but OTOH also a good indicator that something special is happening,  there's not that much more to support active/passive replay than there is for the generic case.


Repository:
  rLLDB LLDB

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D77759/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D77759

Files:
  lldb/include/lldb/Utility/ReproducerInstrumentation.h
  lldb/source/API/SBDebugger.cpp
  lldb/source/API/SBFileSpec.cpp
  lldb/source/API/SBProcess.cpp
  lldb/source/API/SBStructuredData.cpp
  lldb/source/API/SBThread.cpp
  lldb/unittests/Utility/ReproducerInstrumentationTest.cpp

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D77759.258172.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 19136 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-commits/attachments/20200416/f8a00126/attachment-0001.bin>