[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D32167: Add support for type units (.debug_types) to LLDB in a way that is compatible with DWARF 5
Zachary Turner via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Feb 26 18:39:12 PST 2018
Llvm also separates the Integration tests (test-suite) from the regression
tests. That’s another approach to handling the Cartesian product testing
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 6:01 PM Paul Robinson via Phabricator via
lldb-commits <lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> probinson added a comment.
>
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D32167#1020032, @labath wrote:
>
> > Running the entire dotest test suite in -fdebug-types-section is
> certainly a good way to catch problems, but it's not the way to write
> regression tests.
>
>
> Is there testing in place that is more serious/thorough than the normal
> regression testing? It might be reasonable to do the full cartesian set at
> a slower pace. For example LLVM has the concept of "expensive checks" and
> there are a small number of bots out there that enable them. But it's not
> something anybody runs normally.
>
>
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D32167
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lldb-commits mailing list
> lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-commits/attachments/20180227/b0b86ee0/attachment.html>
More information about the lldb-commits
mailing list