[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D31172: Move stop info override callback code from ArchSpec into Process
Pavel Labath via Phabricator via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jul 12 13:03:37 PDT 2017
labath added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D31172#806804, @jingham wrote:
> This is a good addition. However, it seems to me that since you only need an ArchSpec to make one of these Architecture plugins, which plugin you get seems fully determined by the Target, not the Process. I understand that the only need for it at present is to do a Process-related task. But that task actually takes a Thread as a parameter, so the Architecture plugin doesn't need to know it's containing process to do its job. And it seems like it diminishes the plugin's future utility to have it more limited in scope than it needs to be.
> What do you think?
I'm not sure I understand what you are proposing here.
Is it to have the architecture plugin store a Target as a member variable? If that's the case, then I'd say let's wait until a need for that arises. I am not fundamentally against the idea, but I don't see a reason to add it while we don't have a need for it.
More information about the lldb-commits