[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D16936: Remove expectedFailureWindows decorator
Pavel Labath via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Feb 9 10:28:56 PST 2016
On 9 February 2016 at 17:51, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote:
> I agree that you don't need arbitrary complexity, but I think there are some things we would greatly benefit from. For example, have you ever seen this?
> That's 3 decorators, when you could write it as 1:
> @expectedFailure(or(oslist="windows", compiler="gcc", hostoslist="linux"))
Maybe that's a matter of preference, but I would much rather see the
former than the latter.
What I would like to avoid is having two decorators like:
@xfail(or(a=A, not(b=B)), c=C')
@xfail(a=A', or(b=B', not(c=C')))
on a single test. At that point it becomes quite impossible to figure
out when the test gets run.
Also, arguably, if you are doing "or", then you are probably dealing
with separate bugs, and each should deserve it's own bugnumber.
More information about the lldb-commits