[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D16936: Remove expectedFailureWindows decorator
Zachary Turner via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Feb 9 09:51:32 PST 2016
zturner added a comment.
In http://reviews.llvm.org/D16936#347141, @labath wrote:
> I think this is getting way too complicated. I haven't seen any test
> which needs such complicated combinations of skip conditions (and I
> hope I never see one).
I agree that you don't need arbitrary complexity, but I think there are some things we would greatly benefit from. For example, have you ever seen this?
That's 3 decorators, when you could write it as 1:
@expectedFailure(or(oslist="windows", compiler="gcc", hostoslist="linux"))
The rest of the functionality I mentioned you practically get for free if you support this.
More information about the lldb-commits