[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r247133 - Change the looping stack detection code
Tamas Berghammer via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Sep 9 03:26:50 PDT 2015
Author: tberghammer
Date: Wed Sep 9 05:26:50 2015
New Revision: 247133
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=247133&view=rev
Log:
Change the looping stack detection code
In some special case (e.g. signal handlers, hand written assembly) it is
valid to have 2 stack frame with the same CFA value. This CL change the
looping stack detection code to report a loop only if at least 3
consecutive frames have the same CFA.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12699
Modified:
lldb/trunk/source/Plugins/Process/Utility/RegisterContextLLDB.cpp
Modified: lldb/trunk/source/Plugins/Process/Utility/RegisterContextLLDB.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/lldb/trunk/source/Plugins/Process/Utility/RegisterContextLLDB.cpp?rev=247133&r1=247132&r2=247133&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- lldb/trunk/source/Plugins/Process/Utility/RegisterContextLLDB.cpp (original)
+++ lldb/trunk/source/Plugins/Process/Utility/RegisterContextLLDB.cpp Wed Sep 9 05:26:50 2015
@@ -634,28 +634,30 @@ bool
RegisterContextLLDB::CheckIfLoopingStack ()
{
// If we have a bad stack setup, we can get the same CFA value multiple times -- or even
- // more devious, we can actually oscillate between two CFA values. Detect that here and
+ // more devious, we can actually oscillate between two CFA values. Detect that here and
// break out to avoid a possible infinite loop in lldb trying to unwind the stack.
- addr_t next_frame_cfa;
- addr_t next_next_frame_cfa = LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS;
- if (GetNextFrame().get() && GetNextFrame()->GetCFA(next_frame_cfa))
+ // To detect when we have the same CFA value multiple times, we compare the CFA of the current
+ // frame with the 2nd next frame because in some specail case (e.g. signal hanlders, hand
+ // written assembly without ABI compiance) we can have 2 frames with the same CFA (in theory we
+ // can have arbitrary number of frames with the same CFA, but more then 2 is very very unlikely)
+
+ RegisterContextLLDB::SharedPtr next_frame = GetNextFrame();
+ if (next_frame)
{
- if (next_frame_cfa == m_cfa)
- {
- // We have a loop in the stack unwind
- return true;
- }
- if (GetNextFrame()->GetNextFrame().get() && GetNextFrame()->GetNextFrame()->GetCFA(next_next_frame_cfa)
- && next_next_frame_cfa == m_cfa)
+ RegisterContextLLDB::SharedPtr next_next_frame = next_frame->GetNextFrame();
+ addr_t next_next_frame_cfa = LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS;
+ if (next_next_frame && next_next_frame->GetCFA(next_next_frame_cfa))
{
- // We have a loop in the stack unwind
- return true;
+ if (next_next_frame_cfa == m_cfa)
+ {
+ // We have a loop in the stack unwind
+ return true;
+ }
}
}
return false;
}
-
bool
RegisterContextLLDB::IsFrameZero () const
{
More information about the lldb-commits
mailing list