[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] RFC: Proposed change in the disassembly default format in lldb

[Zachary Turner]

Isn't this proposal only for cases of jumping to somewhere else in the same function?  Admittedly that's usually the most common type of jump, since it accounts for every control flow instruction.

In any case, I think my suggestion of displaying the operand to the jump instruction as either

jmp function + offset   (addr)                     ; comment

or

jmp <(this func) + offset>  (addr)              ; comment

looks the best, but if you think that's outside the scope of this change, then I would at least vote for

jump addr                                              ; <(this func) + offset>

(basically the same as your original proposal, except add some kind of word or string in the middle of <+offset> to make it easier on the eyes.


REPOSITORY
  rL LLVM

http://reviews.llvm.org/D7578

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/