[Lldb-commits] MSVC12 support

Greg Clayton gclayton at apple.com
Wed Sep 4 10:07:55 PDT 2013


Looks fine to me.

On Sep 4, 2013, at 9:19 AM, Virgile Bello <virgile.bello at gmail.com> wrote:

> Would such a patch be OK for getopt? (with OptionParser.h)
> Didn't try to hide actual getopt architecture, but at least it prevents <getopt.h> from being included directly.
> 
> If this gets accepted, the remaining part of MSVC patch should be quite small.
> 
> 
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 5:02 AM, Greg Clayton <gclayton at apple.com> wrote:
> Yes in general to abstract ourselves from the system on which we are compiling:
> 
> 1 - First try and use LLVM functionality where it makes sense
> 2 - Use LLDB Host layer
> 3 - Use #ifdef in .cpp files only if possible
> 4 - Use $ifdef in .h files as a last resort.
> 
> To get back to the "getopt.h" stuff, it would be great to make a Host class that abstracts us from the "getopt.h" functionality.
> 
> Something like "include/lldb/Host/OptionParser.h" and then a .cpp file in common that hides the abstraction for the actual unix version that is used for everything but windows, and a windows specific one that could use a compatibility layer...
> 
> Greg
> 
> On Aug 28, 2013, at 9:35 AM, Virgile Bello <virgile.bello at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Ha yes sure, I thought that was not recommended since LLVM was not used for many other similar situations (i.e. Mutex, Regex, Argument parsing vs getopt, some path functions, etc...).
> > But I suppose it is maybe due more to the fact it wasn't good/stable enough at the time you needed it, and switch would be OK now?
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 1:07 AM, João Matos <ripzonetriton at gmail.com> wrote:
> > +#ifdef _MSC_VER
> > +        InterlockedIncrement(&m_last_revision);
> > +#else
> >          __sync_add_and_fetch(&m_last_revision, +1);
> > +#endif
> >
> > I see this pattern ifdef'd in a lot of places, I think we should abstract it in an helper "atomics" function, or even better, just re-use LLVM support libraries (llvm::sys::AtomicIncrement).
> >
> >
> > --
> > João Matos
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > lldb-commits mailing list
> > lldb-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
> 
> 
> <lldb-getopt.diff>





More information about the lldb-commits mailing list