[libcxx-commits] [libcxx] [libc++] Mark LWG3403 as resolved (PR #208866)

[A. Jiang via libcxx-commits]

================
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
 "`LWG3036 <https://wg21.link/LWG3036>`__","``polymorphic_allocator::destroy`` is extraneous","2020-11 (Virtual)","|Nothing To Do|","","`#104276 <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/104276>`__","Reverted by P2875R4"
 "`LWG3171 <https://wg21.link/LWG3171>`__","LWG2989 breaks ``directory_entry`` stream insertion","2020-11 (Virtual)","|Complete|","14","`#104277 <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/104277>`__",""
 "`LWG3306 <https://wg21.link/LWG3306>`__","``ranges::advance`` violates its preconditions","2020-11 (Virtual)","|Complete|","14","`#104279 <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/104279>`__",""
-"`LWG3403 <https://wg21.link/LWG3403>`__","Domain of ``ranges::ssize(E)`` doesn't ``match ranges::size(E)``","2020-11 (Virtual)","","","`#104280 <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/104280>`__",""
+"`LWG3403 <https://wg21.link/LWG3403>`__","Domain of ``ranges::ssize(E)`` doesn't ``match ranges::size(E)``","2020-11 (Virtual)","|Nothing To Do|","","`#104280 <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/104280>`__",""
----------------
frederick-vs-ja wrote:

> I'd personally prefer to put 15 for consistency. Is that alright with you?

Please don't be consistent with a wrong record.

I believe we should say P1970R2 and LWG3403 were implemented in LLVM 13. `libcxx/docs/Status/Cxx20Issues.csv` should be corrected, but possibly it's OK to do that in another PR.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/208866