[libcxx-commits] [PATCH] D140407: [libc++][doc] Adds Kona plenary papers and issues.

Mark de Wever via Phabricator via libcxx-commits libcxx-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Dec 20 08:59:22 PST 2022


Mordante marked an inline comment as done.
Mordante added a comment.

Thanks for the review!



================
Comment at: libcxx/docs/Status/Cxx2bPapers.csv:98
 "","","","","",""
+"`P1202R5 <https://wg21.link/P1202R5>`__","LWG", "Asymmetric Fences", "November 2022","","",""
+"`P1264R2 <https://wg21.link/P1264R2>`__","LWG", "Revising the wording of ``stream`` input operations", "November 2022","","",""
----------------
philnik wrote:
> I don't think we normally track TS papers, do we? Same question for P1478R8 and P2396R1. If we do IMO it would make sense to mark them with something like `|Concurrency TS|`
We at least track LWG issues for them. Adding a label to them sounds like a good idea.


================
Comment at: libcxx/docs/Status/Cxx2bPapers.csv:99
+"`P1202R5 <https://wg21.link/P1202R5>`__","LWG", "Asymmetric Fences", "November 2022","","",""
+"`P1264R2 <https://wg21.link/P1264R2>`__","LWG", "Revising the wording of ``stream`` input operations", "November 2022","","",""
+"`P1478R8 <https://wg21.link/P1478R8>`__","LWG", "``Byte-wise`` ``atomic`` ``memcpy``", "November 2022","","",""
----------------
philnik wrote:
> @ldionne Do you know if this is implemented in libc++?
I assume we don't, but I noticed the author too.


================
Comment at: libcxx/docs/Status/Cxx2bPapers.csv:105
+"`P2539R4 <https://wg21.link/P2539R4>`__","LWG", "Should the output of ``std::print`` to a terminal be synchronized with the underlying stream?", "November 2022","","","|format|"
+"`P2589R1 <https://wg21.link/P2589R1>`__","CWG", "``static`` ``operator[]``", "November 2022","","",""
+"`P2602R2 <https://wg21.link/P2602R2>`__","LWG", "Poison Pills are Too Toxic", "November 2022","","","|ranges|"
----------------
philnik wrote:
> This seems to exclusively be core wording and has nothing to do with the library.
A yes I was mistaking it for the `static operator()`, but that's a different paper.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D140407/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D140407



More information about the libcxx-commits mailing list