[libcxx-commits] [PATCH] D140407: [libc++][doc] Adds Kona plenary papers and issues.

[Nikolas Klauser via Phabricator via libcxx-commits]

philnik added subscribers: ldionne, philnik.
philnik added inline comments.


================
Comment at: libcxx/docs/Status/Cxx2bPapers.csv:98
 "","","","","",""
+"`P1202R5 <https://wg21.link/P1202R5>`__","LWG", "Asymmetric Fences", "November 2022","","",""
+"`P1264R2 <https://wg21.link/P1264R2>`__","LWG", "Revising the wording of ``stream`` input operations", "November 2022","","",""
----------------
I don't think we normally track TS papers, do we? Same question for P1478R8 and P2396R1. If we do IMO it would make sense to mark them with something like `|Concurrency TS|`


================
Comment at: libcxx/docs/Status/Cxx2bPapers.csv:99
+"`P1202R5 <https://wg21.link/P1202R5>`__","LWG", "Asymmetric Fences", "November 2022","","",""
+"`P1264R2 <https://wg21.link/P1264R2>`__","LWG", "Revising the wording of ``stream`` input operations", "November 2022","","",""
+"`P1478R8 <https://wg21.link/P1478R8>`__","LWG", "``Byte-wise`` ``atomic`` ``memcpy``", "November 2022","","",""
----------------
@ldionne Do you know if this is implemented in libc++?


================
Comment at: libcxx/docs/Status/Cxx2bPapers.csv:105
+"`P2539R4 <https://wg21.link/P2539R4>`__","LWG", "Should the output of ``std::print`` to a terminal be synchronized with the underlying stream?", "November 2022","","","|format|"
+"`P2589R1 <https://wg21.link/P2589R1>`__","CWG", "``static`` ``operator[]``", "November 2022","","",""
+"`P2602R2 <https://wg21.link/P2602R2>`__","LWG", "Poison Pills are Too Toxic", "November 2022","","","|ranges|"
----------------
This seems to exclusively be core wording and has nothing to do with the library.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D140407/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D140407