[libcxx-commits] [PATCH] D92397: [libc++] Always define a key function for std::bad_function_call in the dylib

Konstantin Varlamov via Phabricator via libcxx-commits libcxx-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Nov 15 14:41:45 PST 2021


var-const added inline comments.


================
Comment at: libcxx/lib/abi/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.libcxxabi.v1.stable.exceptions.no_new_in_libcxx.abilist:3
 {'is_defined': False, 'name': '_ZNKSt13runtime_error4whatEv', 'type': 'FUNC'}
+{'is_defined': False, 'name': '_ZNKSt9exception4whatEv', 'type': 'FUNC'}
 {'is_defined': False, 'name': '_ZNSt11logic_errorD2Ev', 'type': 'FUNC'}
----------------
ldionne wrote:
> var-const wrote:
> > This is from running `generate-cxx-abilist` on Linux (in a Docker container). I'm not sure about `exception::what`, but some symbols below (e.g. `_ZTVNSt3__120__time_get_c_storageIcEE`) seem clearly unrelated -- perhaps the ABI list wasn't regenerated on Linux at some point?
> This is a bit strange indeed. I would suggest you don't add these unrelated symbols and see what the CI says. Normally, we're checking this list in the CI so it should never get out of sync.
I copied this file from the CI now, as we discussed. Most extra symbols are gone, but this one persists. Should I add it to the changelog?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D92397/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D92397



More information about the libcxx-commits mailing list