[libcxx-commits] [PATCH] D92397: [libc++] Always define a key function for std::bad_function_call in the dylib
Konstantin Varlamov via Phabricator via libcxx-commits
libcxx-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Nov 15 14:41:45 PST 2021
var-const added inline comments.
================
Comment at: libcxx/lib/abi/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.libcxxabi.v1.stable.exceptions.no_new_in_libcxx.abilist:3
{'is_defined': False, 'name': '_ZNKSt13runtime_error4whatEv', 'type': 'FUNC'}
+{'is_defined': False, 'name': '_ZNKSt9exception4whatEv', 'type': 'FUNC'}
{'is_defined': False, 'name': '_ZNSt11logic_errorD2Ev', 'type': 'FUNC'}
----------------
ldionne wrote:
> var-const wrote:
> > This is from running `generate-cxx-abilist` on Linux (in a Docker container). I'm not sure about `exception::what`, but some symbols below (e.g. `_ZTVNSt3__120__time_get_c_storageIcEE`) seem clearly unrelated -- perhaps the ABI list wasn't regenerated on Linux at some point?
> This is a bit strange indeed. I would suggest you don't add these unrelated symbols and see what the CI says. Normally, we're checking this list in the CI so it should never get out of sync.
I copied this file from the CI now, as we discussed. Most extra symbols are gone, but this one persists. Should I add it to the changelog?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D92397/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D92397
More information about the libcxx-commits
mailing list