[libcxx-commits] [PATCH] D62428: [libcxx] Slightly improved policy for handling experimental features

[JF Bastien via Phabricator via libcxx-commits]

jfb added a comment.

In D62428#1518488 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D62428#1518488>, @mclow.lists wrote:

> The deletions are fine, the doc updates are good, but I think deprecation warnings are not.
>  Things that are going to happen in the future (a year from now, say) or never (if people don't update their tools) don't belong in the warning spew for **every single build**


Similar deprecation warnings are pretty common coming from clang (both for standard things as well as extensions / builtins). What Louis proposes seems consistent with what the compiler does. Do you think there's a better approach that libc++ could take?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D62428/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D62428