[libcxx-commits] [PATCH] D62932: Update status

Wed Jun 5 14:45:50 PDT 2019

mclow.lists added a comment.

In D62932#1531634 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D62932#1531634>, @ldionne wrote:

> > 2750 nothing to do because std::experimental::optional no longer exists.
>
> This is correct, however the current wording for `optional::optional(U&&)` does NOT have a condition like `!std::is_same<T, std::remove_reference_t<U>>::value`. Was it "forgotten" when we Standardized `std::optional`? If so, then maybe we need to create a LWG issue.

I'm looking into that; that portion of the standard has seen a lot of churn.

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D62932/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D62932