[libcxx-commits] [PATCH] D62932: Update status

[Zoe Carver via Phabricator via libcxx-commits]

zoecarver added a comment.

@ldionne I talked with @mclow.lists about this because I was wondering the same thing. He is looking into it.

It seems like an odd constraint to have because there is no other constructor which would allow for constructing an `optional<T>` with a `T`.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D62932/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D62932