[flang-commits] [flang] [mlir] [Flang][Openmp] Implement support for partial in unroll construct (PR #206642)

[via flang-commits]

ShashwathiNavada wrote:

As per the  spec:
`If the partial clause is used without an unroll-factor argument, then the unroll factor is a positive integer that is implementation-defined.`

Currently, I have kept this case under a TODO section. I’d like to get input on what would be the better approach here, should we assign some default implementation-defined value, fall back to heuristic unrolling, or handle it differently?

Thank you.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/206642