[cfe-dev] Seeking maintainers of the clang-c interface and the cindex Python wrapper

Arthur Peters via cfe-dev cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
Mon Dec 2 10:02:25 PST 2019


One possibility would be to have me be an unofficial owner for a while
and have someone with commit access act as an intermediary and sanity
check until it's appropriate for me to be the official owner. Regardless
of how we slice this, there will be a need for a few people who are
willing to review my changes (I'm happy to round-robin to spread the
work) even though they are not interested my pet module. Eventually
small changes will not need review, but larger changes still will, so
the need for reviewers will not totally go away.

-Arthur

On 12/2/19 10:26 AM, David Blaikie wrote:
> Richard Smith (as code owner of Clang) is probably the decider here
> (cc'd) - and, yeah, it's a bit awkward having an owner who hasn't
> previously had commit access etc - but that seems to me to be the
> nature of finding owners for abandoned components like this. So I'm
> leaning towards "yeah, this seems reasonable" (but might require some
> of us folks who don't have much involvement to at least review a few
> of your patches to check we're generally on the same page with regards
> to design, etc).
>
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 3:47 PM Arthur Peters via cfe-dev
> <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
>
>     Hello all,
>
>     I have a couple of revisions to the clang-c API (the C interface
>     in libclang) and to the Python wrapper of it (cindex). But I have
>     not been able to find a maintainer who could review these changes.
>
>     Are there current maintainers for these components?
>
>     If there is not, I may be willing to take on at least the Python
>     component given that I have found it very useful and expect to
>     continue using it. Would this be useful to the community? (I don't
>     yet have commit access or anything, so I know it would be a process.)
>
>     -Arthur
>
>     PS: The existing revisions which need review are: D70358: Add
>     Cursor.get_reference_name_range to clang python binding
>     <https://reviews.llvm.org/D70358> https://reviews.llvm.org/D10833
>     , and D10833: Retrieve BinaryOperator::getOpcode and
>     BinaryOperator::getOpcodeStr via libclang and its python interface
>     <https://reviews.llvm.org/D10833> https://reviews.llvm.org/D70358
>     (which I commandeered and updated). I also have several other
>     changes locally that I would like to push once I get a hang for
>     the process. The are all extensions and bug fixes for clang-c and
>     cindex.
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     cfe-dev mailing list
>     cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>
>     https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20191202/382cd74b/attachment.html>


More information about the cfe-dev mailing list