[cfe-dev] [analyzer] Emit errors from StaticAnalyzer
Sachkov, Alexey via cfe-dev
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
Tue May 15 01:01:52 PDT 2018
Hi,
Here is an example of diagnostic I implemented: https://github.com/AlexeySachkov/clang/commit/fc9ffedea8155cfd8cdd5da1861b9642e0a6646d
And I was able to launch only my checker without any crashes of clang.
I’m trying to figure out where is the best place for such diagnostics:
· StaticAnalyzer:
o + modular, every additional implemented diagnostic/checker can be enabled separately
o – cannot emit errors by default
· Sema
o – not modular, no fully-built AST (may be “workarounded” like it is done for CUDA)
o + no problems with emitting errors, absolutely the right place for semantic analysis.
· Clang-plugins, clang-based tools (clang-tidy), build system configuration
o – not acceptable solution for me
From: Gábor Horváth [mailto:xazax.hun at gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2018 11:51 PM
To: George Karpenkov <ekarpenkov at apple.com>
Cc: Sachkov, Alexey <alexey.sachkov at intel.com>; Clang Dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>
Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] [analyzer] Emit errors from StaticAnalyzer
Hi George!
George Karpenkov via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>> ezt írta (időpont: 2018. máj. 11., P 22:37):
Hi Alexey,
Could you give some examples of diagnostics you have implemented?
In general, clang static analyzer emits warnings as it is allowed to have false positives by design.
I think your workflow can be achieved without any changes required though: if you know that checker X
will not have false positive, you can just configure your build system to fail the build if the static analyzer
finds any bugs with only your checker turned on.
Unfortunately, it is not that easy. Running the analyzer without the core checks is not supported and likely to cause crashes. Core checks, however, might give false positives. To support this scenario, we should be able to turn diagnostics off from core checks (but keep the modeling part).
Regards,
Gábor
Regards,
George
On May 11, 2018, at 3:22 AM, Sachkov, Alexey via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
Hi,
I would like to ask what do you think about having possibility to emit errors from clang StaticAnalyzer?
Recently I encountered a problem with implementing complex diagnostics in clang (which requires call graph analysis, for example): it is hard to implement such diagnostics in Sema because there is no place with fully-built AST.
So, I used static analyzer and implemented a few additional checkers, but the problem with static analyzer is that all diagnostics are emitted as warnings.
Here is an example of the patch I would like to commit: https://github.com/AlexeySachkov/clang/commit/898c9c566d4c1c37c2d56787fd08ff8b1697aca9
What do you think?
If there are no objections from adding possibility to emit errors from static analyzer, I will put a patch for review. Any comments on implementation?
My main task is to implement some diagnostic messages, probably someone can advise me a better solution than static analyzer? Here an example (I’m interested in OpenCL C):
int val __attribute__((my_attr1));
void func() {
val = 10; // expected-error{{variables declared with my_attr1 attribute cannot be used from kernels declared with my_attr2 attribute}}
}
__attribute__((my_attr2))
__kernel void my_kernel() {
func();
}
I knew that call graph analysis is used in Sema during compilation of CUDA sources and if static analyzer is completely wrong place for such stuff, I can try to use CUDA approach and update the Sema.
Also I wouldn’t like to use clang plugins or to create a clang-based tool.
Best regards,
Alexey Sachkov
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Joint Stock Company Intel A/O
Registered legal address: Krylatsky Hills Business Park,
17 Krylatskaya Str., Bldg 4, Moscow 121614,
Russian Federation
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
_______________________________________________
cfe-dev mailing list
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
_______________________________________________
cfe-dev mailing list
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Joint Stock Company Intel A/O
Registered legal address: Krylatsky Hills Business Park,
17 Krylatskaya Str., Bldg 4, Moscow 121614,
Russian Federation
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20180515/b74e7ea2/attachment.html>
More information about the cfe-dev
mailing list