[cfe-dev] Fwd: [libc++] Is libc++ compatible with previous c++ language standard implementation

[Hubert Tong via cfe-dev]

On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:31 AM, Zeson Wu <westion717 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes, how about the result? So I do not know the way libc++ source do that
> losing semantic of copy construction is legal or not.
>
I am not aware of there being direction from the committee to make it
legal; however, that possibility has not been rejected either.


>
> BTW, hmmmm, interesting email address name. 😀😂
>
> 2018-03-08 23:01 GMT+08:00 Hubert Tong <hubert.reinterpretcast at gmail.com>:
>
>> This sounds related to http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG
>> /lwg-active.html#2695.
>>
>> -- HT
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20180308/403cc88b/attachment.html>