[cfe-dev] getLocStart versus getStartLoc

[Richard Smith via cfe-dev]

On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 at 01:05, Stephen Kelly via cfe-dev <
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> Richard Smith via cfe-dev wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 9 Jul 2018 at 14:06, Stephen Kelly via cfe-dev <
> > cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Stephen Kelly via cfe-dev wrote:
> >>
> >> > 1) DeclarationNameInfo has both getLocEnd and getEndLoc. Both are used
> >> > by calling code, and I can't tell if any use is incorrect. At any
> rate,
> >> > if the two methods are to remain, the getLocEnd() one should be
> renamed
> >> > to something more specific as it is the one doing something different
> >> > to other getLocEnd/getEndLoc methods which generally don't 'try again'
> >> > in
> >> the
> >> > invalid case.
> >>
> >> I created a patch to inline getLocEnd() into callers.
> >>
> >>  https://reviews.llvm.org/D49100
> >
>
> Can I commit this now? I have other things I want to get done in the clang
> codebase related to other AST issues and related to Clang.
>
> However, all of the changes I want to make will need to be reviewed, so I
> can't really justify working on them until I can estimate whether they
> will
> be reviewed.
>
> Can I just go ahead and commit that, or is there some issue with it?
>

Yes, go ahead. (Sorry, I missed that you'd updated the patch.)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20180730/44d177f4/attachment.html>