[cfe-dev] clang-tidy checks for High integrity C++
Jonathan Coe via cfe-dev
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jan 24 12:02:57 PST 2017
> On 24 Jan 2017, at 19:14, David Tarditi <dtarditi at microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> Jonathan Coe wrote “I did not see any restrictions on distribution of the PDF I got”. Just to point out that there is a “Conditions of Use” at the end of the PDF (a rather unusual location). It’s quite liberal:
>
> Conditions of Use
> You are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit) this complete work, or parts of this work, subject to
> attributing to PRQA as follows, “HIC++ Coding Standard as created by PRQA” (and you must not in any
> way suggest that PRQA endorses you or your use of this work).
>
> This is good to see because some other widely-used industry coding standards such as MISRA C require individual or corporate purchase of the documentation (see https://www.misra.org.uk/MISRAHome/MISRAC2012/tabid/196/Default.aspx, for example).
>
> David
>
Oops and thanks
Jon
>
> From: cfe-dev [mailto:cfe-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Coe via cfe-dev
> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 6:02 AM
> To: Ben Cox <cox at djehuti.com>
> Cc: Clang Dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>
> Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] clang-tidy checks for High integrity C++
>
>
>
> On 24 January 2017 at 13:52, Ben Cox <cox at djehuti.com> wrote:
> On Jan 24, 2017, at 8:49 AM, Jonathan Coe <jbcoe at me.com> wrote:
> Strong yes here, and might be able to devote some resources to helping with the effort.
> Are you interested in High-integrity C++ in particular or safety-critical checks in general?
>
> High-Integrity C++ in particular. (We'd want to customize the checks, of course, since our coding standard, while based on HIC++, has a few exceptions and differences from the "official" spec.)
>
>
> I've asked the owners of High Integrity C++ if we can use the name for a clang-tidy module. If they are not happy we can call it `safety` or `safetycritical` instead.
>
> -- Ben
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20170124/4a349c6e/attachment.html>
More information about the cfe-dev
mailing list