[cfe-dev] Clang should natively support fortran

[Asiri Rathnayake via cfe-dev]

Glad to be of help! :)

@Ed: You said:

"...heavily modified version of LLVM libunwind in NetBSD, which excludes
the HP unwind interface and requires much less stack space."

May be we should try and get them (stack usage improvements) into llvm
libunwind? We're interested!

(I have a few more improvements in the pipe-line, but mostly focusing on
ARM EHABI)

Cheers,

/ Asiri


On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 6:59 PM, Ed Maste via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
> wrote:

> On 4 July 2016 at 13:33, Ed Maste <emaste at freebsd.org> wrote:
> >
> > Yes, the plan is to use it on all architectures eventually. One open
> > issue with LLVM's libunwind is that it requres more stack -- see the
> > thread at
> http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-January/094202.html.
>
> As it turns out I hadn't been paying attention to libunwind progress
> over the last two months or so. This is now fixed (r270692, r271004,
> r272680). Thank you Asiri!
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20160706/22ec7564/attachment.html>