[cfe-dev] Clang on Windows targteing gcc compiles very slowly

[Yaron Keren]

I wouldn't expect clang-cl (targeting VC) build time to be different than
clang (targeting mingw), so the difference is probably not clang on WIndows
specifically but rather clang in general.
Could you send a small example outlining the difference?



2015-06-01 18:54 GMT+03:00 Dennis Luehring <dl.soluz at gmx.net>:

> i've got the same compilation difference between cl and cl-clang using the
> http://llvm.org/builds/
>
> is there an official cl/cl-clang testprojects collection or how is the
> testing done?
>
>
> Am 01.06.2015 um 17:47 schrieb Yaron Keren:
>
>> >How and with what ?
>>
>> Comparing the compilation time between snapshot binary and the version you
>> built locally will pinpoint if the problem is in clang in general or some
>> local configuration.
>>
>>
>>
>> 2015-06-01 18:06 GMT+03:00 Edward Diener <eldlistmailingz at tropicsoft.com
>> >:
>>
>> > On 6/1/2015 12:24 AM, Yaron Keren wrote:
>> >
>> >> Edward, could you time the snapshot binaries from
>> >> http://llvm.org/builds/
>> >>
>> >
>> > How and with what ?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > cfe-dev mailing list
>> > cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
>> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cfe-dev mailing list
>> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20150601/ee802dfd/attachment.html>