[cfe-dev] Outdated fragment in comparison between Clang and GCC

[Richard Smith via cfe-dev]

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 4:32 AM, Michał Piechowski <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> this page:
> http://clang.llvm.org/comparison.html#gcc
> claims that:
> "GCC supports many language extensions, some of which are not implemented
> by Clang. For instance, in C mode, GCC supports nested functions
> <http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Nested-Functions.html> and has an undocumented
> extension allowing VLAs in structs
> <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37428>."
>
> which is outdated since VLA in structures is already documented in GCC.
> Please refer to:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc/trunk/gcc/doc/extend.texi?r1=208836&r2=208835&pathrev=208836
>
> I guess removing "uncodumented" word from mentioned sentence should be
> enough.
>

That documentation is still extremely incomplete :)

Anyway, fixed in r255723. Thanks!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20151215/46b1bb4d/attachment.html>