[cfe-dev] Clang 3.5 Release Pre-Pre-Pre-Announcement

[Hans Wennborg]

On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Kim Gräsman <kim.grasman at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 9:46 PM, Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Richard <legalize at xmission.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> The more we discuss this, the more I'm leaning in the direction of a
>>> different SDK package containing library variant(s) and headers,
>>> leaving the "product" package containing all the binaries but no
>>> headers or librarys or language bindings (i.e. no libclang, python,
>>> etc.).
>>
>> That is my preference as well.
>
> Same here.
>
> The only possible drawback is that to maintain a Unix-like filesystem
> layout (today %PROGRAMFILES%\LLVM\ is the equivalent of /usr/), the
> different installers will have to put their respective files in the
> same root. I'm not sure if that's a problem for NSIS to have two
> packages installed into the same directory, but I figure it might be.

If we make separate packages for toolchain and SDK, I think they
should have different default install dirs.

 - Hans