[cfe-dev] MSVC RTTI implementation status

[David Majnemer]

Among all those I know of working on the MS ABI compatibility, none have
made RTTI an immediate priority.  Personally, I've made progress
understanding some of the subtleties of the format. However, I've put this
work on my back-burner because it requires changes to LLVM IR itself.

In general, ABI compatibility is most easily achieved when IR constructs
are able to already represent ABI constructs.

I don't think it would be unreasonable for us to maintain a list of things
we do and do not claim to support.

On Sat Feb 22 2014 at 11:42:59 PM, Dennis Luehring <dl.soluz at gmx.net> wrote:

> would be great to have an place for related information to keep track of
> the progress
>
> ABI
> (PDB-Support?)
> etc.
>
> Am 23.02.2014 03:10, schrieb Kim:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'd just like to inquire about the status of the MSVC compatible RTTI
> > implementation, when it might be complete and how I can keep track of
> > progress on this feature.
> >
> > Thanks very much,
> > Kim
> > _______________________________________________
> > cfe-dev mailing list
> > cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20140224/5028d76e/attachment.html>