[cfe-dev] [LLVMdev] [RFC] Raising LLVM minimum required MSVC version to 2013 for trunk
Richard Gorton
rcgorton at cog-e.com
Sat Aug 23 17:44:05 PDT 2014
The 'technical question at hand' is a case of whining about how
Micro$lop tools are broken and that we should adjust our behavior to
conform to their idiocy. I'm being extremely polite. If you want to
use MSVC, fine. Go do so. But QUIT trying to turn LLVM into an MSVC
replacement.
On 8/23/2014 8:32 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Richard Gorton <rcgorton at cog-e.com
> <mailto:rcgorton at cog-e.com>> wrote:
>
> "Not that broken".
> Really? What a truly self-condemning statement.
>
> Why do developers make such ridiculous statements about broken tools?
>
>
> Folks, this thread needs to stay focused on the technical question at
> hand. This isn't a forum for complaining about the state of software
> development tools at large or our attitudes toward them (complacent or
> otherwise).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20140823/436641d7/attachment.html>
More information about the cfe-dev
mailing list