[cfe-dev] [GSoC] "C++0x Lambda functions implementation"

[Nicola Gigante]

It seems this reply arrived only to me:

On 31 Mar, 2011,at 09:51 PM, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk> wrote:


Fantastic. I've been working through some of the other new C++11 features
(auto, for-range and alias-declaration so far) and would love to see more
people working on this stuff.


As far as I'm aware, the late-specified return types feature is complete,
other than updating the external website. I fixed all the issues I could
find with it and added a bunch of tests as part of the 'auto' work. We're
already advertising support for it via __has_feature(cxx_trailing_return).
(One minor thing: we don't appear to have any tests checking that we
create the correct mangled names). 
 
I see! I didn't know that.
Anyway, I think another feature that would be needed is
'local classes in template parameters', I should include it in the proposal.

Anyway, someone had news about the rumored patch from 'alp'?
I'm going to push this proposal to melange since the GSoC students application
deadline is near.
Anybody would like to mentor this idea?

Bye,
Nicola
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20110405/25d3adc5/attachment.html>