[cfe-dev] CFG temporary objects destructors

[Ted Kremenek]

On Oct 22, 2010, at 1:13 AM, Zhongxing Xu wrote:

> Basically this assumption doesn't match how we treat binary operators in the CFG.  We should probably fix having the LHS always precessed first.  Any objections?
> 
> I agree. So  the fix would be in CFGBlock *CFGBuilder::VisitChildren(Stmt* Terminator), visit the children in reverse order.
> 

My caution here is that we don't want to make CFG construction time too expensive, as it will directly impact compile-time.  I'm not saying we shouldn't do this, only that we are mindful of possible performance implications.

In this case, I would just start with handling BinaryOperator more correctly.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20101022/a8657180/attachment.html>