[cfe-dev] checking for virtual members

[John Thompson]

>Why? Is this what GCC does?

Yes.  The class example I enclosed previously will build with our gcc,
whereas Clang would not, as Clang only allows a strict POD class or struct
in the original code.  I just posted a patch on cfe-commits to fix this.

-John

On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Douglas Gregor <dgregor at apple.com> wrote:

>
> On Nov 1, 2010, at 5:05 PM, John Thompson wrote:
>
> > I need a way easily check to make sure a function has no virtual
> functions, or other stuff that would inject extra stuff into an object or
> structure, as part of the validation for the vecreturn attribute.  How do I
> do it?
> >
> > Checking the CXXRecordDecl::PlainOldData flag with isPOD doesn't work,
> because the the strict definition of POD goes too far for this case.
>
> Why? Is this what GCC does?
>
>        - Doug




-- 
John Thompson
John.Thompson.JTSoftware at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20101102/322218b5/attachment.html>