[clang] [Clang][Sema] Don't treat error-recovery dependence as genuine template dependence in ActOnTag (PR #221440)

[via cfe-commits]

github-actions[bot] wrote:

<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->


:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning:

<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>

``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff origin/main HEAD --extensions cpp -- clang/test/SemaCXX/GH220525.cpp clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp --diff_from_common_commit
``````````

:warning:
The reproduction instructions above might return results for more than one PR
in a stack if you are using a stacked PR workflow. You can limit the results by
changing `origin/main` to the base branch/commit you want to compare against.
:warning:

</details>

<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>

``````````diff
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
index 6a5248823..ded0affb7 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
@@ -18379,7 +18379,8 @@ Sema::ActOnTag(Scope *S, unsigned TagSpec, TagUseKind TUK, SourceLocation KWLoc,
         // placeholder. Only in that genuine case should we defer/treat this
         // as a dependent name for the caller to handle.
         const Type *T = SS.getScopeRep().getAsType();
-        IsDependent = isDependentScopeSpecifier(SS) &&  (!T || !T->containsErrors());
+        IsDependent =
+            isDependentScopeSpecifier(SS) && (!T || !T->containsErrors());
         return true;
       }
     } else {

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/221440