[clang] [Clang][OpenMP] Fixed an assertion when `#pragma omp declare simd` or `#pragma omp declare variant` is followed by another OpenMP declarative directive containing a qualified identifier (PR #217875)

[Shengxin Pei via cfe-commits]

================
@@ -2215,17 +2215,11 @@ Parser::DeclGroupPtrTy Parser::ParseOpenMPDeclarativeDirectiveWithExtDecl(
       return DeclGroupPtrTy();
     }
 
-    auto HasNewDecl = [&] {
-      DeclGroupRef DG = Ptr.get();
-      SourceManager &SM = PP.getSourceManager();
-      for (const Decl *D : DG) {
-        if (SM.isBeforeInTranslationUnit(Loc, D->getBeginLoc()))
-          return true;
-      }
-      return false;
-    };
-
-    if (!HasNewDecl()) {
+    DeclGroupRef DG = Ptr.get();
+    SourceManager &SM = PP.getSourceManager();
+    if (!llvm::any_of(DG, [&](const Decl *D) {
+          return SM.isBeforeInTranslationUnit(Loc, D->getBeginLoc());
+        })) {
----------------
TPPPP72 wrote:

@alexey-bataev Oh, it should be `SM.isBeforeInTranslationUnit(Loc, D->getBeginLoc());` not `!SM.isBeforeInTranslationUnit(Loc, D->getBeginLoc());` ^_^

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/217875