[clang] [Clang][Sema] Reject template arguments not equivalent to their copies (part of P2308R1) (PR #193754)
Yanzuo Liu via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Aug 5 20:59:50 PDT 2026
================
@@ -7417,6 +7477,12 @@ ExprResult Sema::CheckTemplateArgument(NamedDecl *Param, QualType ParamType,
if (Value.isAddrLabelDiff())
return Diag(StartLoc, diag::err_non_type_template_arg_addr_label_diff);
+ if (ParamType->isRecordType() &&
+ !ParamType->isInstantiationDependentType() &&
----------------
zwuis wrote:
> So I'd expect we would create a `TemplateParamObjectDecl` with such a type, and then later substitute that, producing another `TemplateParamObjectDecl`. So any changes to the `Profile` function would not really be necessary, if I haven't misunderstood anything.
I think this _is_ necessary.
```cpp
static void /*TemplateParamObjectDecl::*/Profile(FoldingSetNodeID &ID, QualType T, const APValue &V) {
ID.AddPointer(T.getCanonicalType().getAsOpaquePtr());
// ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
V.Profile(ID);
}
```
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/c3a0eb4b8f4f4b5c4b705c04bc3f16e4985ddbdf/clang/include/clang/AST/DeclTemplate.h#L3317-L3321
This is also why
> 2. When checking template arguments of a non-dependent template id, we still use that `TemplateParamObjectDecl` from the cache map.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/193754
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list